Running Product Development in the Age of AI

A practical account of what changed when a real team tried to ship real software while development speed fundamentally increased — and what we had to relearn along the way.

1 June 2026
Christopher Batey, CTO
35 min
DevCon 2026

Want to discuss these ideas with us?

No pitch — just an honest conversation about what's working.

Continue the Conversation
Over the last year, I've built and scaled a new product engineering team from scratch: hiring, training, and shipping a real product while AI-assisted development rapidly changed how software gets built.
What surprised me most wasn't the tooling. It was how often our ways of working stopped being effective.
Roughly every quarter, we had to rethink how the team operated: how changes reach production, how engineers work day-to-day, and even how the system itself must be designed to support dramatically faster development.
This talk shares three practical pillars we've learned for running product development in the age of AI.

Path to Production at AI Speed

When engineers — and AI — can generate change faster than ever, safety can no longer rely on manual review alone. This section covers the verification layers we introduced to prevent costly mistakes before production: automated architectural checks, API and schema protection, stronger static validation, and testing strategies designed for high change velocity.

Training and Evaluating AI-Enabled Engineers

AI tools don't automatically make teams effective. We had to explicitly train engineers in new workflows and rethink how we evaluate engineering performance. This section shares how we coach engineers to work with AI systems productively, and what signals actually indicate effective AI-assisted development.

Designing Workflow for Parallel Change

Our current product workflow assumes many concurrent changes happening safely at once. This section walks through how we use preview environments, isolated branches, and architectural boundaries that allow teams to move quickly without constant coordination or instability.

Want to Discuss These Ideas?

We regularly have conversations with engineering leaders navigating these same challenges. No pitch — just an honest exchange of what's working.

Continue the Conversation